Remember, remember the Fukushima nuclear disaster on this day?
juan
juan.g71 at gmail.com
Mon Mar 14 02:21:11 PDT 2016
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 06:49:30 +0000 (UTC)
jim bell <jdb10987 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: juan <juan.g71 at gmail.com>
> To: cypherpunks at cpunks.org > So after s quick search, seems that
> the containment of the > general electric designed reactor(s)
> failed? Maybe americunts > should be paying damages?
> How so?
Did you see my previous message?
https://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2016-March/012590.html
> It looks like it worked like it was designed to work.
The design was supposed to contain the melted suff in case of a
'melt-down' - but it didn't. So, no, I don't think it worked
like it was designed to.
> The
> problem is, a decision had been made about making a seawall only a
> certain height, and putting the switching circuitry in the basement
> which could be flooded.
Well, yes, more than a few things failed at once.
> No doubt both these decisions had been
> approved by the Japanese involved. Now, if it had been determined
> later that they wanted to protect against much larger earthquakes and
> higher tsunamis, they could have increased the seawall height and
> sealed the basement of the reactor better. They chose not to do so.
> Jim Bell
>
>
>
>
More information about the Testlist
mailing list