How much/what hardware does the rowhammer DRAM bug affects?
jim bell
jdb10987 at yahoo.com
Thu Sep 17 23:54:58 PDT 2015
From: Georgi Guninski <guninski at guninski.com>
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:46:26PM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
>http://users.ece.cmu.edu/~omutlu/pub/dram-row-hammer_kim_talk_isca14.pdf
>p. 32 of the PDF:
>.– Simple ECC (e.g., SECDED) cannot prevent all errors
>From wikipedia: Tests show that simple ECC solutions, providing
>single-error correction and double-error detection (SECDED)
>capabilities, are not able to correct or detect all observed
>disturbance errors because some of them include more than two flipped
>bits per memory word.[1]:8[11]:32
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Row_hammer#cite_ref-isca14-talk_11-0
But all single-bit and triple-bit errors are detectable by parity, and so are all double-bit errors using ECC. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_random-access_memory#Errors%5Fand%5Ferror%5Fcorrection
Jim Bell
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 2581 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/testlist/attachments/20150918/fe4541b7/attachment.txt>
More information about the Testlist
mailing list