Underestimating long-term consequences of cryptoanarchy

[Tyler Durden]

Tim May wrote...

>>But my point is that heavy crypto will probably have unforseeable effects 
>>on the notion of the state, >>probably not wipe it out.


>Banal comments.

>Come back when you have something to actually say.

Poo poo, King of the Anarchists. Those banal comments were made in response 
to an earlier statement of mine taken out of context.

-TD

PS: How long, on average, after someone signs onto the list does it take for 
you to 'plonk' them? I guess this means you need a constant supply of "fresh 
meat" in order for you to find out what's being discussed!


>From: Tim May <timcmay at got.net>
>To: cypherpunks at lne.com
>Subject: Re: Underestimating long-term consequences of cryptoanarchy
>Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 23:59:57 -0700
>
>On Tuesday, May 6, 2003, at 08:05  AM, Tyler Durden wrote:
>
>>Kevin S. vanHorn wrote...
>>
>>>>Likewise with governments. I still need my trash taken out, and for 
>>>>potholes to be fixed.
>>>
>>>
>>>What makes you think government is needed at all for these?  My trash is 
>>>taken out by a private company, not by any government.  And privately 
>>>built and maintained roads have existed for a very long time.
>>
>>Of course. But you've got to read further into my post to see the point.
>>I'm thinking that in the future, some aspects of government might be 
>>competitive with the private sector to obtain public $$$, much like the US 
>>mail now competes with UPS and FedEx. Like in Stephenson's Snow Crash, 
>>many functions might be opt-in, including possibly war....
>>
>>For instance, imagine where budget items are voted on directly, and 
>>regularly by voters. Would IraqII have occurred? (I bet not.) (My Jazz 
>>musician brother has suggested that "you should be able to vote any 
>>elected official directly into jail, no questions asked".)
>>
>>But my point is that heavy crypto will probably have unforseeable effects 
>>on the notion of the state, probably not wipe it out.
>
>Banal comments.
>
>Come back when you have something to actually say.
>
>
>
>--Tim May
>"That the said Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress 
>to infringe the just liberty of the press or the rights of conscience; or 
>to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from 
>keeping their own arms." --Samuel Adams

_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail