Who represents the detained? Nobody...
Luthor Blisset
saeq at gmx.net
Mon Oct 15 18:50:46 PDT 2001
At 06:16 PM 10/15/01 -0700, somebody with the password to tcmay at got.net wrote:
>On Monday, October 15, 2001, at 06:07 PM, Luthor Blisset wrote:
>> Do you seriously think that justifies suspension of due process?
>> If you don't, why did you bring it up? That aside, I think it's been
>> sufficiently demonstrated that you shouldn't treat people like
>> collateral damage unless you wish to receive similar consideration...
>The Constitution applies at _all_ times. It is not something that is only
>for nice, calm situations.
>
>The Bill of Rights does not say that the various parts of the Bill of
>Rights are suspendable when someone decides there is some reason to. This
>means the USA Bill, with its suspension of big chunks of the Fourth
>Amendment, is ipso facto unconstitutional.
You won't hear any disagreement from me, man. I was wondering if
Anonymous was actually attempting to justify suspension of due process.
Incedentally, I wonder if the USA Bill will get overturned by the
Supreme Court anytime soon... Naaaa... Gr.
-- Luthor //Remembering is copying and copying is THEFT
More information about the Testlist
mailing list