National Academy of Sciences panel hears about porn & kids
Declan McCullagh
declan at well.com
Thu Dec 14 04:40:00 PST 2000
http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,40653,00.html
How X Rates With 'W'
by Declan McCullagh (declan at wired.com)
8:00 a.m. Dec. 13, 2000 PST
WASHINGTON -- Advisory committees inside the federal bureaucracy
usually inhabit that featureless terrain between obscurity and
futility: There's no pay, scant power and little prestige.
But when a group is created by the respected National Academy of
Sciences, and when the topic is the politically heated brew of sex,
kids and the Internet, traditional rules no longer apply.
With an eye to making a recommendation to Congress next year, the
academy's committee on Internet pornography and inappropriate material
met on Wednesday to hear social science experts describe the effects
of smut and violence on the youth of America.
It's a sure bet Washington will be paying close attention to the
results. Republicans have pledged that the Justice Department will
pounce on "obscene" websites should George W. Bush gain the
presidency. Bush himself has railed against offensive content online,
and he has endorsed library and school filtering.
"One of the reasons we've had very little success (getting sex and
violence off TV) is that television controls the message," said Joanne
Cantor, a communications professor at the University of Wisconsin.
"The positive thing may be that television is more willing to focus on
the horrors of the Internet than the horrors of television," Cantor
said.
Cantor, like the other presenters, didn't confine her remarks to porn.
Although figuring out how to shield kids from digital prurience is the
group's primary task, it's also charged with considering "other
inappropriate Internet content."
That's arguably a pretty vague mission, but the committee members were
too busy agreeing with the speakers to quibble.
[...]
Wednesday's meeting of the National Academy of Sciences panel was
designed to explore "non-technical" strategies for protecting children
from offensive material -- such options include providing guidelines
for parents and educating kids about sexuality. Technical options the
panel will weigh include filtering software, the creation of a new
top-level domain, rating systems, and regulations or new laws directed
at sexually explicit sites online.
The committee's stated goal is to "provide a foundation for a more
coherent and objective local and national debate on the subject of
Internet pornography" while avoiding "specific" recommendations
directed at new laws or regulations.
This week's meeting is the third. The group will next meet in March in
the San Francisco area to discuss technical options, and finally in
June 2001 in Chicago.
[...]
More information about the Testlist
mailing list