Onion routing

[Lucky Green]

On Mon, 19 Jan 1998, Ulf [iso-8859-1] Möller wrote:
> Does that mean that every onion router needs to maintain many
> encrypted links, or is there a more efficient solution?

To get any meaningful security, the user  has to control  the first OR.
Furthermore, it must be impossible to discern indiviual messages, meaning
connections being opened or  closed. Which requires Pipenet, possibly the
worst bandwidth burner ever  invented. :-)

-- Lucky Green <shamrock at cypherpunks.to> PGP v5 encrypted email preferred.
   "Tonga? Where the hell is Tonga? They have Cypherpunks there?"