HACKERS SMASH U.S. GOVERNMENT ENCRYPTION
Dave Emery
die at pig.die.com
Thu Jun 19 15:22:05 PDT 1997
Bill Stewart wrote :
> On the other hand, DES really is _much_ weaker than the DESCHALL
> project indicates - Intel CPUs aren't at all tuned for DES cracking,
> whereas a custom DES-cracker with similar horsepower could have
> done the job a lot faster. If I remember right, Wiener's design
> used 64,000 chips, about as many as there were PCs working DESCHALL,
> for a crack that would take hours instead of months.
The way I like to look at it, it should be easy these days to do
a compiled custom chip deeply pipelined enough to try one key per
clock. And ASICs running at 200 mhz aren't that uncommon these days.
That is one key every 5 nanoseconds, or .2 billion keys a second, thus
only aout 40 of these chips ( a medium size board's worth which could
sit in a single PC slot) could equal the maximum rate the huge
distributed cracked attained as documented in Sameer's press release.
Dave Emery
die at die.com
More information about the Testlist
mailing list