What is the EFF doing exactly?
jim bell
jimbell at pacifier.com
Wed Sep 4 00:49:14 PDT 1996
At 10:41 PM 9/3/96 -0500, Jon Lebkowsky wrote:
>The terms "responsibility" and "accountability" are misused, which is
>unfortunate, since I think we'd all argue in favor of taking responsibility
>for our speech/actions in a positive sense. The negative is in asking me to
>sacrifice my freedom because some few behave irresponsibly. This is like
>setting an illogical default, assuming that it's a preventive, but it
>prevents nothing.
>
>Getting beyond this discussion of EFF, has any global entity discussed
>making remailers illegal?
The Leahy crypto bill introduced early this year made (paraphrasing) "the
use of encryption to thwart a law-enforcement investigation illegal." I
immediately pointed out that while this wouldn't make _encrypted_ remailers
illegal, per se, effectively it would because the moment an investigation
(even a phony or trumped-up one) is started and is "thwarted" by the
encryption used, the remailer operator became guilty of a crime.
True, the USG isn't quite a "global entity" (even though it has a nasty
habit of behaving like it!), but along with Europe (which would presumably
treaty with USG any such restrictions) it's the next closest thing.
Jim Bell
jimbell at pacifier.com
More information about the Testlist
mailing list