An alternative to remailer shutdowns
Rich Graves
llurch at networking.stanford.edu
Tue May 21 23:35:50 PDT 1996
On Tue, 21 May 1996, Ben Holiday wrote:
> After pondering a bit it seems to me that the "knock knock" remailer
> approach (only send anon-mail if the recipient agrees to receive it) could
> be made feasable pretty easily.
>
> Rather than hold the mail while waiting for a consent to release, you
> could simply encrypt the peice of mail with a symetric algorythm on its
> final hop, and send the encrypted mail to the recipient.
Interesting idea, but anything requiring specific software on the user's
end is a losing proposition IMO.
remailer-operators at c2.org removed cuz I ain't one.
-rich
More information about the Testlist
mailing list