Can the inevitability of Software privacy be used to defeat the ITAR?

[jim bell]

At 11:27 PM 7/12/96 -0700, Bill Frantz wrote:
>At  9:21 PM 7/12/96 -0400, Michael Froomkin wrote:
>>> could claim that MIT came very close to violating ITAR, but the same claim
>>
>>"The ITAR do not apply to books"
>
>I'm not sure the exact legalities apply here.  I think it is more like the
>mob pressuring business men for protection and punishing those who do not
>comply.


And that's what "our" government's coming to!  Does anybody still think that 
they're not going to deserve what they get?

Jim Bell
jimbell at pacifier.com