validity of the RSA patent

[Mark C. Henderson]

> > Consider use of another public key encryption scheme, say LUC encryption.
> 
> Which, of course, is patent-pending.  It appears that we can no more
> make progress in cryptography in the face of algorithm patents than
> we could advance mathematics under the burden of theorem licensing.
> We can't afford to wait until 2001.

On the other hand, perhaps the patent holder of LUC would be willing
to licence LUC for use in a PGP-like tool (or PGP 3.0) on the same basis 
IDEA is now licenced to PGP users. (i.e. non-commerical use is OK. Even 
certain commercial use is OK.)

This might solve a lot of our problems.

Has anybody asked? I can't be the first person to have considered
asking. 

Mark

-- 
Mark Henderson
markh at wimsey.bc.ca
RIPEM key available by key server/finger/E-mail
  MD5OfPublicKey: F1F5F0C3984CBEAF3889ADAFA2437433