Test. Sorry.

[nobody at cicada.berkeley.edu]

This is a test.  Apologies for wasted bandwidth.

AA01851; Thu, 8 Jul 93 11:40:10 EDT
Received: by snark.shearson.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA22568; Thu, 8 Jul 93 11:40:08 EDT
Message-Id: <9307081540.AA22568 at snark.shearson.com>
To: Rachel Beth Goldstein <rbg at panix.com>
Cc: cypherpunks at toad.com
Subject: Re: text p.d. cryptosystems for email 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 08 Jul 1993 11:03:02 EDT."
             <199307081503.AA28828 at panix.com> 
Reply-To: pmetzger at lehman.com
X-Reposting-Policy: redistribute only with permission
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1993 11:40:08 -0400
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <pmetzger at lehman.com>


Rachel Beth Goldstein says:
> 
> this is probably a faq, but pardon me, since this is my first mail to
> the cypherpunks list.  the problem is this: i once worked for a
> (nameless) finance company that had pseudo-wizard-dorkos for sa's, and
> a gravitationally-challenged boss that routinely read employees' (ie.
> *my*) personal email.  i knew this because he asked me specific
> questions regading the email subjects.  both he and the dorkos
> relished this ability and probably got some power trip from it.

This is likely a violation of federal law, but never mind that.

> however, friends told me that (1) crypt is easily compromised, and 
> (2) not all unix sites have crypt available anyway.  are there 
> text-based alternates to crypt, such that i don't have to use 
> uuencode or btoa to mail encrypted text?   

What you want is PGP. Doubtless someone out there is likely to tell
you more about it...

Perry