possible solution to the anonymous h
Marc Horowitz
marc at MIT.EDU
Thu Jan 14 23:40:28 PST 1993
>> One other point I'd make with regard to Marc's message is that if PGP itself
>> is the problem, there's no reason the remailers can't use RIPEM. That's
>> legal in the U.S., so the legality issue would not arise. This might be
>> a good approach to take in broaching the subject with administrators. I
>> haven't looked at RIPEM much but I'm sure the remailers could use it just
>> as easily as PGP. Even non-encrypting remailers can provide basic
>> anonymous posting and mail, if those would be more acceptable.
I thought about this. The major problem is that once the PEM
beta-testing period ends, all keys must be registered with "approved"
(by RSA) central authorities. I highly doubt they'd issue
pseudonymous keys, but maybe they would allow someone to set up a
heirarchy especially for that purpose. I'm not convinced.
Marc
More information about the Testlist
mailing list