[sn-cg] Call today

[Fred Maciel]

Hi folks,

> > Well, looks like the "status" item on the first page pretty 
> much tells 
> > the tale:
> >  
> > "It does not define any standards or technical recommendations."
> >  
> > ;-/
> > 
> 
> That's pretty much always the case for OGF docs until they 
> are in final form, at 
> which point the wording gets changed.

No, that's not the case. These documents only define high-level concepts
and use cases, so they are OGF informational documents, and the wording
is correct.

Once you get the high-level stuff sorted out in these informational
documents, you start to spin-off WGs to make the pieces. These WGs work
on the real service interfaces (i.e., stuff that you can implement), so
these documentts are "proposed recommendations" and then
"recommendations" (similar to "preliminary" and "final" in DMTF
parlance).

Regards,

Fred Maciel
Hitachi America R&D
www.hitachi.com/truestories