Updates to IETF related material in WIKI [was: RE: [scrm-wg] Note s from SCRM Meeting Monday 4/10]

[Winston_Bumpus at Dell.com]

Bert,

Terrific! Thanks. 

I think you could go either way on the SNMP/SMI pages - Your call.

Thanks for your input and help keeping us straight. 


Winston Bumpus
Director, Systems Management Architecture and Standards
Dell Inc.
512.724.7164| voice
Standards at Dell
www.dell.com/standards



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-scrm-wg at ggf.org [mailto:owner-scrm-wg at ggf.org] On Behalf Of
Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 7:05 AM
To: Hiro Kishimoto; Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
Cc: Mark.Carlson at Sun.COM; scrm-wg at ggf.org
Subject: RE: Updates to IETF related material in WIKI [was: RE:
[scrm-wg] Note s from SCRM Meeting Monday 4/10]

Hiro,

Currently all 3 subsections of IETF point to a SNMP page.
That one needs some updates as well. I am considering if it should be an
SNMP and an SMI page. But I could also do a generic page on SNMP/SMI
that covers both. Discussing that with Dan Romascanu.

Bert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-scrm-wg at ggf.org [mailto:owner-scrm-wg at ggf.org]On Behalf Of

> Hiro Kishimoto
> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 13:18
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> Cc: Mark.Carlson at Sun.COM; scrm-wg at ggf.org
> Subject: Re: Updates to IETF related material in WIKI [was: RE:
> [scrm-wg] Note s from SCRM Meeting Monday 4/10]
> 
> 
> Thanks Bert for your update. It looks great.
> 
> Linking the second paragraph to SMTP page (= STD62 and RFC3410) is 
> fine by me. But the first paragraph (SMIv2, STD58 and RFC2578) also 
> have a link (actually the first word of the heading "SMTP") to SMTP 
> page. I think it should link to STD58/RFC2578 instead.
> 
> Your thoughts?
> ----
> Hiro Kishimoto
> 
> Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> > As agreed yesterday,
> > 
> > I have now updated the first page at:
> > 
> >    
> http://testforge.ggf.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.scrm-wg/
> wiki/HomePage
> > 
> > I made a clearer disticting between STD58, STD62 and
> additional documents.
> > I am checking with Dan Romascanu (the new AD for the IETF
> OPS area) if
> > he is OK with that. But anyone who has a comment, pls let me know.
> > 
> > I am now looking at:
> > 
> >   
> http://testforge.ggf.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.scrm-wg/
> wiki/SNMP
> > 
> > Seems to need some updates too. I am working on it.
> > 
> > Bert
> > 
> > 
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: owner-scrm-wg at ggf.org
> [mailto:owner-scrm-wg at ggf.org]On Behalf Of
> >>Mark A. Carlson
> >>Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 15:43
> >>To: scrm-wg at ggf.org
> >>Subject: [scrm-wg] Notes from SCRM Meeting Monday 4/10
> >>
> >>
> >>* Tom Roney
> >>* Winston Bumpus
> >>* Joel Replogle
> >>* Hiro Kishimoto
> >>* Bert Wijnen
> >>* Dan Romascanu
> >>Vincent Francesini
> >>* Heather Kreger
> >>Dave Sidor
> >>* Mark Carlson
> >>Jay Unger
> >>* Eric Seymour (Bridgeman Communications)
> >>
> >>* attended
> >>
> >>Bert discussed his concerns about over selling the
> accomplishments of
> >>the group in the proposed press release. He would be happier if we 
> >>clarified that it is a 10,000 foot view.
> >>
> >>We also discussed making the press release more of an invitation to 
> >>help keep the wiki updated. The goal should not be chest pounding.
> >>The goal
> >>should be to get involvement in keeping the wiki site updated with 
> >>ongoing development of and collaboration by SDOs.
> >>
> >>Bert mentioned that we need to be careful not to stress too
> much the
> >>uniqueness of the effort given the NGNMFG work. We do have 
> >>uniqueness in having it in wiki form that makes it more of a living 
> >>document. We will be careful not to usurp authority that we don't 
> >>have. We are trying to overcome the perception that standards bodies

> >>work in a vacuum. There is some forum shopping going on as people 
> >>take their ideas to more sympathetic groups - the main benefit of 
> >>this work should
> be to make
> >>that less likely by increasing its visibility.
> >>
> >>Eric will soften the press release and craft it more along the lines

> >>of an invitation and send back through Steve Crumb. He will try and 
> >>get it to Steve by Wednesday.
> >>Eric asked about search or shortcut functions. The "Search Wiki 
> >>Pages"
> >>function on test forge seems to be broken.
> >>
> >>All press release quotes should be approved and finalized by April 
> >>21st.
> >>We will meet again next week to review progress on the
> press release.
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
>