[SAGA-RG] Python Bindings

[Ole Weidner]

Hi Andre,

I don't think I can agree with section 1.2 "Security Considerations". It reads:

"A SAGA implementation is considered secure if and only if it fully supports (i.e. implements) the security models of the middleware layers it builds upon, and neither provides any (intentional or unintentional) means to by-pass these security models, nor weakens these security models’ policies in any way."

Implementing the SAGA 'security models' (i.e., saga contexts and maybe permissions?) doesn't make an implementation 'secure'. 'Secure' is a very strong (and overloaded!) term and should really be avoided altogether. 

Best,
Ole 


On Dec 13, 2012, at 18:49 , Andre Merzky <andre at merzky.net> wrote:

> Hi Steve, all,
> 
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Steve Fisher <dr.s.m.fisher at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Andre,
>> Will you circulate a new PDF when you want us to read it again?
>> Steve
> 
> This would be now -- pdf is attached.  Thanks!
> 
> Cheers, Andre.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Nothing is really difficult...
> <saga_bindings_python.pdf>--
>  saga-rg mailing list
>  saga-rg at ogf.org
>  https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/saga-rg