[SAGA-RG] saga core spec - final call

[Hartmut Kaiser]

Andre,

Shouldn't the constructors of namespace, file, directory etc. take url's now
(in stead of the string parameters)? This wouldn't even break existing code
(at least in C++) as long as there is a non-explicit url constructor takig a
string only.

Regards Hartmut

> -----Original Message-----
> From: saga-rg-bounces at ogf.org 
> [mailto:saga-rg-bounces at ogf.org] On Behalf Of Andre Merzky
> Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 3:17 PM
> To: Ceriel Jacobs
> Cc: SAGA RG; Andre Merzky
> Subject: Re: [SAGA-RG] saga core spec - final call
> 
> Good point, and my mistake.  I changes that in the spec.
> 
> Thanks, Andre.
> 
> 
> Quoting [Ceriel Jacobs] (Oct 08 2007):
> > 
> > Hi Andre,
> > 
> > now that the URL specs are in the repository, I have a 
> question about it:
> > why are there separate methods for "username" and 
> "password"? rfc2396 
> > mostly talks about a "userinfo" token, with the user:password 
> > possibility made scheme-specific. In fact, the rfc2396 text warns 
> > against having passwords in there, because of the security 
> risk. So, I 
> > would prefer set_userinfo/get_userinfo methods instead of 
> the get_[username|password]/set_[username|password].
> > 
> > Ceriel
> 
> 
> 
> --
> No trees were destroyed in the sending of this message, 
> however, a significant number of electrons were terribly 
> inconvenienced.
> --
>   saga-rg mailing list
>   saga-rg at ogf.org
>   http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/saga-rg
>