[saga-rg] Re: ISSUE 130

[Andre Merzky]

I think its easiest to have the calls on the task instead of
the object creationg the task - maybe that was the intent
all along.  I thnks that would give no conflicts.

However, error handling for the following two call would be
different then:

  1) dir.copy (a, b);
  2) task t = dir.copy <task> (a, b);

In the first case, the error would be attached to the dir
instance.  In the second case, it would be attached to the
task instance.  

Cheers, Andre.


Quoting [Andre Merzky] (Apr 20 2006):
> Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 18:57:08 +0200
> From: Andre Merzky <andre at merzky.net>
> To: SAGA RG <saga-rg at ggf.org>
> Subject: ISSUE 130
> 
>  130) clearify the error handler interface for async calls
>       - OPEN, URGENT
> 
> I am unsure how the error handler interface applies to
> asynchroneous calls.  Opinions?  Tom, did you consider this?
> 
> Cheers, Andre.
-- 
"So much time, so little to do..."  -- Garfield