[saga-rg] Re: SAGA and Security

[Andre Merzky]

Hi Dane, 

I hope you recovered from Athens :-)

How should we proceed on the SAGA security front?  Should we
try to thrwo some more use cases at you right now, or should
we first try to solve tghose which are on the table?

We had the chance to talk to some GFS folx in Athens before
we left - they encouraged us to go for ACLs for file
permissions.  Would you agree that ACLs are likely to be
_the_ way to go for file permissions?  Would that also be ok
for replica systems and information systems? (SAGA has a
notion of name_spaces, which are used for information
systems, logical files and physical files).

Cheers, Andre.


Quoting [Dane Skow] (Feb 14 2006):
> Cc: SAGA RG <saga-rg at ggf.org>, mulmo at pdc.kth.se
> From: Dane Skow <skow at mcs.anl.gov>
> Subject: Re: SAGA and Security
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:29:15 +0200
> To: Andre Merzky <andre at merzky.net>
> 
> 
> Groan, I just realized that my presentation at the GT4 workshop is at  
> 10:30 session on Wednesday AM so a 3-way conflict. I don't think  
> either Olle or I would be able to make that session. I think Anne's  
> case below is an interesting example to walk through. Let's continue  
> this thread in email.
> 
> Dane
> 
> On Feb 14, 2006, at 12:31 AM, Andre Merzky wrote:
> 
> >Hi Dane,
> >
> >thanks for the remarks and corrections - I should have known
> >that its not _that_ easy as I thought ;-)  It would be
> >perfect to have you at the Wednesday session!
> >



-- 
"So much time, so little to do..."  -- Garfield