[saga-rg] Revised charters
Tom Goodale
goodale at cct.lsu.edu
Wed Feb 8 19:53:58 CST 2006
Hi,
today we had a very productive discussion on the charters on the telecon,
and I am about to post the revised charters to the list.
* We decided on a 3-2 vote on the call that the working group should be
SAGA-CORE-WG.
* We intend to send the charters to the GFSG on Friday morning so they
have sufficient time to digest them before their next meeting. So
please get comments back asap.
* There was discussion as to whether the SAGA-RG should define the process
by which the abstract SIDL specification maps to language specific
bindings. E.g., for procedural languages this would define the naming
of constructors and the way in which overloaded functions get named.
The argument for is that this is being implicitly done during the
implementation phase in the SAGA-CORE-WG anyway, and we want to make
sure that it is consistent across future SAGA-RGs. The argument
against was that it is more documents to produce. We came to no
consensus on this issue and would appreciate any comments from the wider
group.
Ok, I'm going to follow up with the latest charters in seperate mails so
we can discuss.
Cheers,
Tom
More information about the saga-rg
mailing list