[saga-rg] C++ binding: question

[Tom Goodale]

That's what I was assuming would happen, so I'd say go ahead.

Tom

On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Andre Merzky wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> here is another question about the C++ language binding we
> stukmbled upon.  The API spec says that the session is an
> optional argument to each object creation in SAGA.  If the
> session is not given, a default session (theSession) is to
> be associated with the object.
>
> Now, consider a object which has a number of optyional
> parameters already (example not spec conform):
>
>  saga::file (string url, mode=saga::file::mode::RO, saga::session s);
>
> If a programmer wants to specify a session, he NEEDS to
> specify mode, and all other optional parameters of the
> constructor.  For a programmer who always specifies a
> session that is awkward.
>
> OTOH, a constructor like
>
>  saga::file (saga::session s, string url, mode=saga::file::mode::RO);
>
> would giove that programmer the ability to use session and
> rely on parameters defaults, but for another programmer who
> does not use an explicit session it would require to ALWAYS
> specify the session anyway:
>
>  saga::file f (theSession, url);
>
>
> The solution we would like to propose is to introduce two
> versions of all constructors:
>
>  saga::file (                 string url, mode=saga::file::mode::RO);
>  saga::file (saga::session s, string url, mode=saga::file::mode::RO);
>
> which would accomodate both use cases nicely.  To be sure:
> that affects only the C++ language bindings - that might
> look totally different for other languages.
>
> Any comments?  If not, we go for the proposed solution...
>
> Cheers, Andre.
>
>
>