[saga-rg] BOUNCE saga-rg at ggf.org: Non-member submission from ["Andrew Grimshaw" <grimshaw at cs.virginia.edu>] (fwd)

[Shantenu Jha]

From: "Andrew Grimshaw" <grimshaw at cs.virginia.edu>
To: "'Rajic, Hrabri'" <hrabri.rajic at intel.com>,
	"'Tom Goodale'" <goodale at cct.lsu.edu>
Cc: <saga-rg at ggf.org>, <ogsa-wg at ggf.org>,
	"'Bill Nitzberg'" <bill at computer.org>,
	"'Stephen Pickles'" <stephen.pickles at man.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: [ogsa-wg] OGSA EMC BoF on Simple job submission 
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:25:55 -0500


I've been preparing a Basic EMS Services BOF request based on the EMS
documents we have and on the results of last week's EMS F2F in London. The
proposed WG does NOT collide in anyway with JSDL. It is not about "job
submission" - it is about execution management at is simplest. It is highly
complementary in the sense that JSDL is about description - and the proposed
WG is about services to realize what JSDL specifies. I will be reporting on
in during the call tonight - as called for in the agenda Hiro sent around.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ogsa-wg at ggf.org [mailto:owner-ogsa-wg at ggf.org] On Behalf Of
Rajic, Hrabri
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 12:16 PM
To: Tom Goodale
Cc: saga-rg at ggf.org; ogsa-wg at ggf.org; Bill Nitzberg; Stephen Pickles
Subject: [ogsa-wg] OGSA EMC BoF on Simple job submission 

Tom,

Are OGSA EMC people aware of the most recent SAGA-RG work?  Would
SAGA-RG people like to engage OGSA EMC and possibly co-sponsor a Simple
job submission WG?  This could be a nice opportunity to tie in the
classic API and the WSDL approach.

One thing to consider:  Do we really need APIs in SRM, APME, and now in
ARCH areas?

Hrabri


---- from "[ogsa-wg] Proposed agenda for Feb. 7th call" mail by Hiro
-------

4) Simple job submission BoF preparation (30 min)
       From the minutes of Jan. 19 call.
> - There is a plan to do an EM-related BoF. Stacey should know about
>     it but it is not the job of the OGSA-WG to tell her---the
>     proposed-chairs should do it. Preparation has not progressed to
>     that point yet so Andrew as Area Director will take care of it.

>   Action: Andrew as Area director to send an email to the directors of
>          the relevant Area (SRM: Bill, Stephen) to let them know of
>          the proposed BoF; also to Stacey to reserve a slot.

>  - Andrew mentioned that on the Data call there was a discussion for
>    a similar BoF for Data.

    -Hrabri