[saga-rg] Design Team meeting plans..
Andre Merzky
andre at merzky.net
Thu Nov 18 02:54:23 CST 2004
Quoting [Craig Lee] (Nov 18 2004):
>
> All,
>
> A draft agenda will be essential. We can bash it when we get
> started.
I can think of some items I would like to see on the agenda:
1) rehash and agree on target community
- application programers, not Grid folx...
2) rehash and agree on basic design principles
- 80:20 rule
- simplicity
- known paradigms where possible/sensible
--> which rules should govern the design?
3) shortly (!) discuss languages
- c, c++, perl, python, java, fortran, ...
--> one spec for all -> spec object oriented or not
--> which should be addressed? Explicitely?
--> lessons learned in similar specs (GAT, DRMAA)
4) summarize basic requirements and paradigms
- error tracking
- auditing
- tasks
- workflow
- bulk operations
- QoS
--> what should be addressed/kept in mind/ignored?
5) summarize current list of areas of interest
- scope of previous work (CoG, GAT, Triana, RG, EGEE)
- scope of use cases
- derive list of potential 'subsystems'
files, logical files, resources,
6) pick one subsystem - preferably a simple one, of common
interest
7) propose API, and iterate ;-)
8) if time, work on next subsystem
ome of these question could/should be addressed on the mailing
list before I guess, to minimize startup time at the meeting.
Just my 2 cents,
Andre.
PS.: the proposed answers I gave to the points 1-4 above are just
illustrations, and not proposals... ;-) Well, kind of :-P
> Also, we should have:
>
> 1) A list of issues/topics on the table to be decided at the meeting
> 2) Homework to be done before the meeting, e.g., reviewing all the use
> cases and other existing APIs
>
> If everybody does their homework and if we know the major issues on the
> table,
> then we can use our face-time much more effectively!
>
> Also, Shantenu mentioned to me that he was going to pull in the relevant
> use cases
> from OGSA. That should help.
>
> --Craig
>
>
> At 02:42 PM 11/17/2004, Christopher Smith wrote:
> >Ok ... thanks for the clarification Tom. Do we have some kind of agenda
> >yet?
> >Or at least an idea as to what the format of the meeting will be?
> >
> >-- Chris
> >
> >
> >On 17/11/04 10:10, "Tom Goodale" <goodale at cct.lsu.edu> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> the intent was to meet from Monday to Friday. If people arrive on Monday
> >> and leave on Friday we'll only have a three day meeting, which is
> >probably
> >> not going to be very effective..
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Tom
> >>
> >> On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Christopher Smith wrote:
> >>
> >>> I plan to fly in on Monday and leave Friday ... is this what everyone
> >else
> >>> has in mind? I'm assuming the meeting will start on Tuesday morning. I
> >need
> >>> to nail this down real soon.
> >>>
> >>> -- Chris
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 11/11/04 07:41, "Shantenu Jha" <s.jha at ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> All: Mark your calendars - The design meeting is confirmed for the
> >13-17th
> >>>> December at LSU.
> >>>>
> >>>> Tom and I will send a more detailed note about what transpired at the
> >>>> SAGA-F2F (though only three of us were able to make it). There will
> >be a
> >>>> couple of conference calls in the run-up to the design meeting for
> >agenda
> >>>> bashing etc.
> >>>>
> >>>> Tom/LSU folks: Who should people contact for help with local
> >arrangements?
> >>>>
> >>>> More on this thread soon.
> >>>> Shantenu
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> So is there some kind of proposed agenda for this meeting (and is it
> >still
> >>>>> planned for LSU)? I mostly need to start planning travel, and need
> >to know
> >>>>> what days to fly in, etc.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -- Chris
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 1/11/04 16:30, "Andre Merzky" <andre at merzky.net> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Quoting [Keith Jackson] (Oct 29 2004):
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I can do that week. Unless we hear otherwise by Monday afternoon
> >>>>>>> california time, can we just plan on this?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Yes, fixing the date would be very helpful. Works for me, in
> >>>>>> case I didn't say that, yet ;-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Andre.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --keith
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Oct 29, 2004, at 2:03 AM, Andre Merzky wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi all again ;-)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> There have been a number of date proposals for the planned design
> >>>>>>>> team meeting. I am not really sure if there is any agreement by
> >>>>>>>> now, but it seems that December 13-17th is doable after all.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Could we try to come to a final decision soon? :-)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> However, we would like to propose Berlin (aka AEI Potsdam) as the
> >>>>>>>> European meeting place (AG node) - Hartmut volonteered to organize
> >>>>>>>> and host the meeting.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Are there other options for Europe? Cardiff has been in
> >>>>>>>> discussion as well IIRC.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Andre.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
> >>>>>>>> | Andre Merzky | phon: +31 - 20 - 444 - 7759 |
> >>>>>>>> | Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (VU) | fax : +31 - 20 - 444 - 7653 |
> >>>>>>>> | Dept. of Computer Science | mail: merzky at cs.vu.nl |
> >>>>>>>> | De Boelelaan 1083a | www: http://www.merzky.net |
> >>>>>>>> | 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands | |
> >>>>>>>> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
--
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| Andre Merzky | phon: +31 - 20 - 444 - 7759 |
| Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (VU) | fax : +31 - 20 - 444 - 7653 |
| Dept. of Computer Science | mail: merzky at cs.vu.nl |
| De Boelelaan 1083a | www: http://www.merzky.net |
| 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands | |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
More information about the saga-rg
mailing list