[RUS-WG] New Charter with review comments integrated

[m.riedel at fz-juelich.de]

Hi Gilbert,

  well the new document was just to indicate that there are major changes within it.

However, regarding to the audit you may write a paragraph that we put into, since the older paragraph was not precise enough.

Can you do this this evening?

Best regards,
Morris





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morris Riedel
SW - Engineer
Distributed Systems and Grid Computing Division
Central Institute of Applied Mathematics
Research Centre Juelich
Wilhelm-Johnen-Str. 1
D - 52425 Juelich
Germany

Email:  m.riedel at fz-juelich.de
Info: http://www.fz-juelich.de/zam/ZAMPeople/riedel

Phone: +49 2461 61 - 3651
Fax: +49 2461 61 - 6656

Skype: MorrisRiedel

'We work to improve ourselves and the rest of mankind.'

----- Original Message -----
From: Gilbert Netzer <noname at pdc.kth.se>
Date: Friday, January 26, 2007 6:15 pm
Subject: Re: [RUS-WG] New Charter with review comments integrated

> Hi Morris,
> 
> just a few questions:
> 
> When you deleted paragraph 2, does that mean that other WGs are out
> there that define how auditing is to be done?
> In that case it would be good to reference to them, because we 
> would be
> dependent on them. Otherwise, we probably should still state that we
> need to define how to do our own auditing.
> 
> Furthermore I guess we should reference to these WGs if they 
> define for
> us on what granularity access should be granted (collection, record,
> attribute). If they don't we still have to define that in our own
> specification, as done in the current draft.
> 
> One Problem remains though, if we define how to do auditing, or what
> audit information has to be returned, we also sort of define how
> security has to be done (i.e. the current draft says that we 
> return a
> ds:KeyInfo and that means that we need to get this info from 
> somewhere).
> Just to reiterate: The reason why we currently are concerned with
> auditing is that changes to URs should be traceable so that 
> clients can
> establish trust in the contents of the UR (i.e. the UR i got was
> actually created by the resource that executed my job and was not
> modified by anyone). This is also important in the case of conflict
> between resource owner and consumer.
> 
> Best Regards
> Gilbert Netzer
> 
> P.S.: GridForge allows you to upload new versions for the same 
> document.Was there any specific reason to create a new document 
> (therebydiscarding all version history from it)? I have added the 
> new version of
> the charter to the other charter draft (labelled 24th). I guess if it
> just was the date we all do better by not cluttering the document 
> folderand having the version history in the document!
> 
> 
> Morris Riedel wrote:
> > Hi RUS – team,
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > please find on gridforge a slightly modified charter that 
> addressed 
> > review comments:
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > (1)
> > 
> > The appearance of OMII – Europe was significantly reduced since 
> OGF is a 
> > community effort, not a project effort
> > (remains just in context interoperability with funded efforts)
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > (2)
> > 
> > The security paragraph of section 2.2 was more or less what also 
> the 
> > other groups in area security within OGF want to achieve. So I 
> get rid 
> > of it.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > (3)
> > 
> > I try to foster more what should be inside the second 
> specification, 
> > however I’m quite unsure if we should add a profile for 
> connection 
> > technologies such as WS-RF or if we just state a rendering 
> section like 
> > within OGSA-BES with respect to WS-RF…
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > If no other reviews or comments reach me by 20:00 this evening, 
> I will 
> > send our new charter to our area director.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Thanks for helps,
> > 
> > Morris
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------
> > Morris Riedel
> > 
> > SW - Engineer
> > 
> > Distributed Systems and Grid Computing Division
> > Central Institute of Applied Mathematics
> > Research Centre Juelich
> > 
> > Wilhelm-Johnen-Str. 1
> > D - 52425 Juelich
> > 
> > Germany
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Email:  m.riedel at fz-juelich.de <')" >m.riedel at fz-juelich.de>
> > Info: http://www.fz-juelich.de/zam/ZAMPeople/riedel
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Phone: +49 2461 61 - 3651
> > Fax: +49 2461 61 - 6656
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Skype: MorrisRiedel
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 'We work to improve ourselves and the rest of mankind.'
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
> > 
> > --
> >   rus-wg mailing list
> >   rus-wg at ogf.org
> >   http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/rus-wg
> 
>