[rus-wg] RUS Specification - non-repudiation

[Sven van den Berghe]

Hi,

 Non-repudiation is listed as a requirement for the UR storage, but is just
logging names and dates sufficient? E.g. I could repudiate by questioning
the quality of the implementation.

Would it be better to store a digitally signed request?

Sven


"Steven Newhouse" <sjn5 at doc.ic.ac.uk> wrote:

> All,
> 
> Following on from discussions at GGF 13, and contributions from Jon
> MacLaren, John Ainsworth and myself, attached is a revised version of
> the RUS specification.
> 
> Please review and send comments to the list (or authors). It is our
> intention to submit this to the GGF document process at an early date.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Steven

-- 
Sven van den Berghe
Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe
+44 208 606 4651