[Pgi-wg] PGI bylaws and work

[Etienne URBAH]

Morris, Johannes and all,

The 'PGI decision-making guidelines (bylaw)' proposed by Oxana SMIRNOVA 
could perhaps be useful, and I would accept them.


In fact, I am afraid that inside PGI, the main issue is not so much :

               Who is allowed to vote ?

but rather :  Who is willing to devote time to :

-  study and understand the issues ?

-  provide inputs, diagrams and proposals for Use cases, Issues, 
Requirements, Specifications, Conformance tests, ... following the best 
practices of software engineering ?

-  study, constructively criticize, and improve proposals, with good 
traceability ?

-  write down documents presenting the collected (and hopefully agreed) 
Use cases, Issues, Requirements, Specifications, Conformance tests, ... ?


Personally, I have tried to perform the above mentioned work :
-  Input text for Security :  http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/doc15584
-  State Diagram for Job management : 
http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/doc15881
-  Diagram presenting Useful Official and De facto Standards : 
http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/doc15990
-  Wiki permitting traceability for each requirement : 
http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.pgi-wg/wiki/RequirementsTable
-  3 Sequence diagrams describing the relationship between Jobid 
structure and Endpoint migration : 
http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/doc16006 
http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/doc16007 
http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/doc16008
-  Glossary and Terms :  http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/doc16036
-  3 EDGI Use cases :  In particular 
http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/doc16010
-  Chart + Explanations for the PGI priorities : 
http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/doc16156
-  Precise proposal of specification for Publication of Endpoint 
Security Setup using GLUE 2.0 :  http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/doc16157
-  Proposal of specification for the usage of GLUE 2.0 inside JSDL : 
http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.pgi-wg/wiki/ReqJD3


Let us work with enthusiasm !

Best regards.

-----------------------------------------------------
Etienne URBAH         LAL, Univ Paris-Sud, IN2P3/CNRS
                       Bat 200   91898 ORSAY    France
Tel: +33 1 64 46 84 87      Skype: etienne.urbah
Mob: +33 6 22 30 53 27      mailto:urbah at lal.in2p3.fr
-----------------------------------------------------


On Thu, 18/11/2010 02:04, Oxana Smirnova wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> please find attached the promised proposal for the PGI decision-making
> procedures (which looks just like a bylaw now).
>
> It is longer than half a page, but it's basically a formatting matter.
> If it is formatted without bullets (like the "Quorum" section), it gets
> shorter. Preamble can be removed as well, if we are into saving ink and
> paper.
>
> Cheers,
> Oxana

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5073 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/pgi-wg/attachments/20101208/6b15e79f/attachment.bin