[Pgi-wg] requirement document

[Andrew Grimshaw]

Balazs, All,

As I said in my email and comments on the 4/29 draft the GES
strawman/requirements document has several places where it goes from
requirements into specification, and where the requirements are quite vague.
I sent those comments in embedded in the document. My listing of the
requirements was not an attempt to replace the strawman document, but to
distill the requirements from the prose. Without concise requirements it is
difficult to move from requirements to specifications.
A


> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgi-wg-bounces at ogf.org [mailto:pgi-wg-bounces at ogf.org] On Behalf Of
> Balazs Konya
> Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 4:38 AM
> To: David Wallom; pgi-wg at ogf.org
> Cc: Steven Newhouse
> Subject: [Pgi-wg] requirement document
> 
> dear David, Steven, others
> 
> David Wallom wrote:
> was [Pgi-wg] Promised document
> > HI Moreno,
> >
> > Could we then have effort from Balazs, Morris or yourself to remove the
> > "This needs text", "Further info needed" sections etc. Personally I
> prefer
> > the extremely concise list within Andrews document. If we don't like
> that
> > can we strip the Strawman (which it is not a requirements document) of
> > extraneous text and get back to an explicit list of the requirements for
> > specific components.
> >
> > David
> 
> Steven wrote:
> > So what about Andrew's document? He has gone through and enumerated each
> > requirement in a particular area... why would you not use this SHORT
> > document to help determine where we have consensus and where we do not?
> 
>  > Steven
> 
> 
> The group has been discussing the requirement document through quite some
> meetings. By now I consider the requirement document being accepted by the
> group. The document is THIS one:
> 
> http://forge.ogf.org/sf/go/doc15590?nav=1
> 
> and not any kind of derivatives of it.
> 
> The document is still a draft, it needs some further editing.
> Unfortunately,
> that editing work is pending because of the ever opening new discussion
> frontiers.
> 
> I encourage everyone to send corrections related to the *original*
> requirement
> document.
> 
> 
> cheers,
> Balazs
> PGI co-chair
> _______________________________________________
> Pgi-wg mailing list
> Pgi-wg at ogf.org
> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/pgi-wg