[Pgi-wg] Promised document

[Aleksandr Konstantinov]

On Friday 15 May 2009 13:10, David Wallom wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> Can we first agree (on the list, possibly with a doodle vote) that the
> requirements described in Andrews document were accurate. At this first
> stage please ignore the implementation, just are the requirements correct
> and if not what changes are required.

Is RNS requirement or implementation?

A.K.


> 
> David
> 
> 
> On 15/05/2009 09:19, "Moreno Marzolla" <moreno.marzolla at pd.infn.it> wrote:
> 
> > David Wallom wrote:
> >> Hi Moreno,
> >> 
> >> I would consider that this is becoming a fundamental problem within the
> >> group. When it was setup it was certainly the impression of those that
> >> started off the discussions etc that it would be a profiling and current
> >> standards extension effort rather than all new standards...
> > 
> > As far as I'm concerned, I have always been very careful to talk about
> > "profiling and/or writing something new", as it was never said nor
> > suggested that profiling was absolutely the way to go.
> > I agree that this is a fundamental issue, and I'm concerned about any
> > real possibility to reach an agreement.
> > 
> > Moreno.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pgi-wg mailing list
> Pgi-wg at ogf.org
> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/pgi-wg
>