[Pgi-wg] Promised document

[David Wallom]

Hi All,

Can we first agree (on the list, possibly with a doodle vote) that the
requirements described in Andrews document were accurate. At this first
stage please ignore the implementation, just are the requirements correct
and if not what changes are required.

David


On 15/05/2009 09:19, "Moreno Marzolla" <moreno.marzolla at pd.infn.it> wrote:

> David Wallom wrote:
>> Hi Moreno,
>> 
>> I would consider that this is becoming a fundamental problem within the
>> group. When it was setup it was certainly the impression of those that
>> started off the discussions etc that it would be a profiling and current
>> standards extension effort rather than all new standards...
> 
> As far as I'm concerned, I have always been very careful to talk about
> "profiling and/or writing something new", as it was never said nor
> suggested that profiling was absolutely the way to go.
> I agree that this is a fundamental issue, and I'm concerned about any
> real possibility to reach an agreement.
> 
> Moreno.