[Pgi-wg] PGI Execution Service - Realization via existing specifications

[David Wallom]

Hi Etienne,

I personally think that the 'at an affordable cost' criteria that you are
now adding is not really that relevant. Any new implementaion will cost you
money....

David


On 12/05/2009 19:23, "Etienne URBAH" <urbah at lal.in2p3.fr> wrote:

> Andrew,
> 
> Concerning the PGI Execution Service :
> 
> Thank you very much for your 'GES Realization via Existing
> Specifications.doc' proposal, which targets 'as small a specification as
> possible and attempt to use existing specifications and mechanisms when
> it makes sense.'
> 
> In order for your document to be really useful, we all have to carefully
> check if all 'existing specifications and mechanisms' referred by your
> document are :
> -  compatible between each other,
> -  really implementable,
> -  at an affordable cost.
> 
> In order to ease this checks, I propose below links for the 'existing
> specifications and mechanisms referred by your document', and I ask you to :
> -  verify if my links are accurate,
> -  provide the accurate links inside the next version of your document.
> 
> WS-Addressing : 
> http://www.w3.org/Submission/2004/SUBM-ws-addressing-20040810/
> 
> WS-Naming :      http://www.ogf.org/documents/GFD.109.pdf
> 
> OGSA-WSRF-BSP :  http://www.ogf.org/documents/GFD.138.pdf
>                   TO BE VERIFIED
> 
> JSDL :           http://www.ogf.org/documents/GFD.136.pdf
> 
> OGSA-BES :       ATTENTION, you are NOT referring to recommendation
>                   GDF.108, but on 17 April 2009, you sent us DRAFT v32
>                   'ogsa-bes-v32.doc', and you are now referring to
>                   DRAFT v27, which has NO link inside
> http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/docman/do/listDocuments/projects.ogsa-bes-wg/doc
> man.root.current_drafts
>                   Could we use DRAFT v38, which is Version 3 at
>                   http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/doc15062?nav=1 ?
> 
> HPC-BP :         http://www.ogf.org/documents/GFD.114.pdf
> 
> HPC-BP FSE :     http://www.ogf.org/documents/GFD.135.pdf
> 
> RNS :            http://www.ogf.org/documents/GFD.101.pdf
> 
> 
> Thank you in advance.
> 
> Best regards.
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Etienne URBAH         LAL, Univ Paris-Sud, IN2P3/CNRS
>                        Bat 200   91898 ORSAY    France
> Tel: +33 1 64 46 84 87      Skype: etienne.urbah
> Mob: +33 6 22 30 53 27      mailto:urbah at lal.in2p3.fr
> -----------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> On Tue, 12 May 2009, Andrew Grimshaw wrote:
>> Colleagues,
>> 
>> Last week I promised to deliver a document for discussion tomorrow on
>> how to use existing specification (and profiles on those specifications)
>> to realize the requirements in the April 29 draft GES info document.
>> Attached is a word file that sketches out the solution. The document is
>> not intended to be published ­ it is to organize a discussion and give
>> you insight into my proposed solution to the requirements.
>> 
>> I have also carefully read the GES document and have a number of
>> comments on that as well. I will be sending it later today or tomorrow.
>> My comments on the GES are not necessary to understand the ³realization²
>> document. I also encourage you to read the ISV primer.
>> 
>> Andrew
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pgi-wg mailing list
> Pgi-wg at ogf.org
> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/pgi-wg