[Pgi-wg] [gridshib-user] comments regarding a VOMS-SAML token--ANY plan to make VOMS SAML assertion be compatible with WS-Security SAML Token profile?

[Duane Merrill]

>
> Unless I'm missing something, this spec misses the important use case
> where a holder-of-key SAML token is carried in a proxy certificate
> (completely analogous to the typical VOMS AC case).
>


SAML tokens embedded within proxy certificates isn't one of the "common
denominators" identified by the pgi-wg as an "authz plumbing" (to borrow
Morris' phrasing).

And if the point of the PGI-WG is to move forward in a unified direction
with SAML instead of documenting the mish-mash myriad of ways for expressing
the same thing that exist now, then 2.0 would be the place to hang your hat.


-Duane
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/pgi-wg/attachments/20090331/cfe42568/attachment.html