[ogsa-wg] Link to OGF Errata process

[Hiro Kishimoto]

Andreas,

I like an option publishing the Glossary out-of-sync.

Thanks,
----
Hiro Kishimoto

-------- Original Message  --------
Subject: Re:[ogsa-wg] Link to OGF Errata process
From: Andreas Savva <andreas.savva at jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Hiro Kishimoto <hiro.kishimoto at jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Mailing List for OGSA-WG <ogsa-wg at ogf.org>, Greg Newby <newby at arsc.edu>
Date: 2007/07/11 12:49

> Hiro,
> 
> We talked about a few other options including only making those changes
> to the Data section that would bring it into alignment with the
> Glossary. I think that could easily fall in the editorial or minor
> technical fixes category.
> 
> Anywya, I don't really see any urgency to produce a new version of the
> OGSA Architecture document at this point; especially if the main trigger
> for it is the Glossary! At the moment I am leaning more towards the idea
> of publishing the Glossary out-of-sync; or even to leave it as a stable
> group-internal document for now. The second option might not be very
> nice to Jem given all the work he put in.
> 
> Andreas
> 
> Hiro Kishimoto wrote:
>> Thanks Andreas,
>>
>>> Following up on the discussion we had on the Glossary call the proposed
>>> OGF Errata process is available on the OGF Editor project:
>>>   https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/projects/ggf-editor
>> The topics we've discussed at the call are;
>> (a) Revising Data Service section (3.5 page 28-36) reflecting
>>     recent development of OGSA-data WG's data architecture
>>     document. and,
>> (b) Adding new reference model section reflecting consolidation
>>     discussion with reference model WG.
>>
>> They are obviously not either (1) Editorial fixes or (2) Minor
>> technical fixes defined by Greg's errata process. Thus they fall
>> in (3) Major technical fixes category.
>>
>> The OGF Editor suggests two options;
>>> there will need to be a decision whether to fix the document, or
>>> instead seek to write an updated document that will obsolete the old
>>> document.  This decision will be made in cooperation with authors/
>>> editors, the OGF Editor, the cognizant area directors, and GFSG
>>> (others as needed).
>> Although the Editor allows errata process for Major technical fixes,
>> I prefer to write an new version of the document since proposed
>> modifications, (a) and (b), are improvements but not *error* at all.
>>
>> Just my two cents. Thanks,
>> ----
>> Hiro Kishimoto
>>
>> -------- Original Message  --------
>> Subject: [ogsa-wg] Link to OGF Errata process
>> From: Andreas Savva <andreas.savva at jp.fujitsu.com>
>> To: Mailing List for OGSA-WG <ogsa-wg at ogf.org>
>> Date: 2007/07/10 14:58
>>
>>> Following up on the discussion we had on the Glossary call the proposed
>>> OGF Errata process is available on the OGF Editor project:
>>>   https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/projects/ggf-editor
>>>
>>> The direct link is
>>>   http://forge.ogf.org/short/ggf-editor/errata
>>>
> 
> 
>