[ogsa-wg] Proposal for re-organizing trackers

Andreas Savva andreas.savva at jp.fujitsu.com
Mon Oct 23 00:17:56 CDT 2006


No particular reason, besides the obvious one that I was only looking at
how to re-structure the trackers, and was not concerned with putting all
the relevant files into each release.

I would actually like to leave this job as an exercise for the document
editor.

Andreas

Hiro Kishimoto wrote:
> Thanks Andreas,
> 
> New tracker usage is pretty nice.
> 
> Is there any reason you do not add GFD.44 and GFD.81 to "file-releases"?
> Although it consumes extra storage space, I think file-release is
> designed for that way.
> 
> Thanks again,
> ----
> Hiro Kishimoto
> 
> Andreas Savva wrote:
>> Here's what the latest proposal for the trackers looks like. (This is
>> already done for the Glossary tracker if anyone wants to have a look.)
>>
>> 1. One tracker per document; instead of archival+current as in the
>> original proposal
>>
	:


-- 
Andreas Savva
Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd




More information about the ogsa-wg mailing list