[ogsa-wg] Proposed agenda for June 12th call
Hiro Kishimoto
hiro.kishimoto at jp.fujitsu.com
Sun Jun 11 06:43:43 CDT 2006
Hi all,
> 2) CDDLM & EMS (Jun and Hiro, 40 min)
> Review CDDLM-WG's feedback on Andreas' CDDLM scenario.
> Jun and Hiro to provide a CDL document example.
Please find first-cut proposal for CDL documents.
BasicPosixComponent.xml:
CDL document component for BasicPosixComponent
Blast.xml:
CDL document for Blast Application
I value your feedback.
Thanks,
----
Hiro Kishimoto
Hiro Kishimoto wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The following is a proposed agenda for OGSA-WG telecon on June 12th
> Monday from 5pm to 7pm (CDT).
>
> The dial-in number for Monday;
> US: +1 718 3541071 (New York) or
> +1 408 9616509 (San Jose)
> UK: +44 (0)207 3655269 (London)
> Japan: +81 (0)3 3570 8225 (Tokyo)
> PIN: 4371991
>
>
> Screen share service will be provided.
> URL: http://ogsa.glance.net
> Session key: 0612
> See more explanation:
> http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/ogsa-wg/2004/06/msg00077.html
>
> 1) Early discussion (20 min)
> Note taker assignment
> Roll call
> Telecon minutes approval (June 8th)
> https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/doc13592?nav=1
> July F2F update (if any)
> Action Items status review (see the bottom of this email)
> Agenda bashing
>
> 2) CDDLM & EMS (Jun and Hiro, 40 min)
> Review CDDLM-WG's feedback on Andreas' CDDLM scenario.
>
> Jun and Hiro to provide a CDL document example.
>
>> Last week on the ogsa call we reviewed the EMS scenario (posix
>> application) that includes a simple interaction between JSDL and CDL
>> documents. The major missing piece at the moment is the CDL document,
>> as an actual XML document. Can I ask you to write up such a document?
>> I am only interested in the 'top level' (sorry for using perhaps the
>> wrong terminology) CDL BLAST document. I think it only has to
>> highlight
>> 1) hostname as lazy (so that we can show how the JM may choose to
>> provide that value)
>> 2) BLAST binary deployment
>>
>> Last time we talked about it (April F2F) I think this discussion got
>> somewhat sidetracked by, among other things, the observation that a
>> general posix application component also had to be defined to support
>> the 'top level' CDL BLAST document. For this EMS scenario I think it
>> is *not* necessary to have such a general component defined as long as
>> there is sufficient explanation accompanying the BLAST CDL document on
>> what underlying definitions are assumed.
>
> 3) Wrap up (10 min)
> AOB
>
> <*NEXT CALL*>
> June 15 (Thu): Security & BSP Public Comments review (Frank and Takuya)
> Architecture & Glossary 1.5 (Andreas and Jem)
> June 19 (Mon): Information model (Ellen and Fred)
> Roadmap 1.1 (Hiro, ChrisJ, and Jem)
> June 22 (Thu): EMS scenarios (Steven and Andreas)
> June 26 (Mon): Security & BSP Public Comments review (Frank and Takuya)
> CDDLM & EMS (Jun and Hiro)
>
> <*ACTION ITEMS*>
> From June 8 call
> - EMS team to review data staging scenario (section 5 of
> https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/doc13591?nav=1 )
> - Add sequence diagrams to the scenarios:
> - Andreas will do the "Install application" scenario (3.1)
> - Mike will do the "Install application using ACS" scenario (3.3)
> - Other volunteers welcome. (Andreas will ask Donal for the EPS
> scenario)
> - Andreas will merge draft scenarios and sequence diagrams to the
> "EMS Architecture Scenarios" document
>
>> From May 22 call
> - Jay will contact Platform (Chris Smith) and Condor (Miron Livny)
> to get feedback on pros / cons of the two rendering approaches
> - Darren/Andreas will take the Modeling position paper and
> discuss it within the JSDL-WG as well
>
>> From April 5 F2F meeting
> - Marvin to send e-mail that explains concerns on compliance suite
> by GGF & EGA.
>
> Deferred
> - Frank to write up and send to the list a one page summary of
> the authorization call-out proposal.
> (April 24 call, postpone until June 14)
> - Jay check and find out relatively small funding to Globus
> to develop document on their security work (April 6 F2F)
> - Hiro to schedule a discussion in the OGSA F2F after the
> converged specs drafts are released to discuss which sets of
> specs to use within OGSA. (April 4 F2F)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: BasicPosixComponent.xml
Type: text/xml
Size: 817 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/ogsa-wg/attachments/20060611/83c1ba50/attachment.bin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Blast.xml
Type: text/xml
Size: 1363 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/ogsa-wg/attachments/20060611/83c1ba50/attachment-0001.bin
More information about the ogsa-wg
mailing list