[ogsa-wg] OGSA WSRF BP 1.0 Editor submission final call

[Djaoui, A (Abdeslem)]

Hi Hiro

I would like to, but we would need to identify people who are willing to contribute to this initiative. I can of course do EGEE and make some guesses 
at some other projects, but it would be better if we have some input from the projects themselves. Any name suggestions?

Abdeslem


-----Original Message-----
From: Hiro Kishimoto [mailto:hiro.kishimoto at jp.fujitsu.com]
Sent: Sat 9/24/2005 2:35 AM
To: Djaoui, A (Abdeslem)
Cc: Andreas Savva; ogsa-wg at ggf.org
Subject: Re: [ogsa-wg] OGSA WSRF BP 1.0 Editor submission final call
 
Hi Abdeslem,

As a first step of defining Discovery and Registry in the Grid, can
you champion a study of existing grip projects; EGEE, OMII, Globus,
UNICORE, TeraGrid, etc.

Thanks,
----
Hiro Kishimoto

Andreas Savva wrote:
> In OGSA, yes. But the WSRF BP is not the place to make such statements.
> The Roadmap is, so if there is a specific plan it should be added there.
> 
> Djaoui, A (Abdeslem) wrote:
> 
> 
>>Well, my point is that Discovery is fundamental in OGSA and MUST be (not MAY be) addressed by OGSA, especially now that UDDI is excluded from the base profile. But I agree that the plans and decisions are still to be discussed.
>>
>>Abdeslem
>>/////////////
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Andreas Savva [mailto:andreas.savva at jp.fujitsu.com]
>>Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 2:10 PM
>>To: Djaoui, A (Abdeslem)
>>Cc: Hiro Kishimoto; ogsa-wg at ggf.org
>>Subject: Re: [ogsa-wg] OGSA WSRF BP 1.0 Editor submission final call
>>
>>
>>I disagree. There are no firm decisions or plans so 'may' is more
>>appropriate at the moment.
>>
>>Andreas
>>
>>Djaoui, A (Abdeslem) wrote:
>>
>> 
>>
>>
>>>Hi 
>>>
>>>Following from previous email... I see I am too late and a decision has
>>>already been made. So I suggest modifying the sentence
>>>"There may be
>>>additional profiles in the future that will include discovery functions"
>>>
>>>to:
>>>
>>>"Discovery will be covered by future specifications and profiles."
>>>
>>>Abdeslem
>>>//////////////
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: owner-ogsa-wg at ggf.org [mailto:owner-ogsa-wg at ggf.org] On Behalf Of
>>>Hiro Kishimoto
>>>Sent: 22 September 2005 09:26
>>>To: ogsa-wg at ggf.org
>>>Subject: [ogsa-wg] OGSA WSRF BP 1.0 Editor submission final call
>>>
>>>Hi all,
>>>
>>>At the today's OGSA-WG call, we discussed BP 1.0 once more and agreed
>>>the following two;
>>>
>>>(1) Exclude UDDI section of WS-I BP 1.1 from OGSA WSRF BP
>>>Now, section 1.2 (page 4 line 114-116) says;
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>>
>>>>This Profile extends the WS-I Basic Profile 1.1 [WS-I BP 1.1]. All
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>
>>>requirements except for section 5 "Service Publication and Discovery"
>>>specified in WS-I BP 1.1 pertain to this Profile. There may be
>>>additional profiles in the future that will include discovery functions.
>>>
>>>Revised really final draft (v043) is on the GridForge.
>>>https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-wg/document/draft-ggf-ogsa-wsr
>>>f-basic-profile/en/39
>>>
>>>(2) Submit OGSA WSRF BP 1.0 (v043) to GGF Editor this Friday
>>>Given that OGSA Basic Security Profiles need more time to complete
>>>(maybe after GGF15), we agreed to submit OGSA WSRF BP 1.0 alone to GGF
>>>Editor this Friday. If you have any farther comments on this draft,
>>>please let us know before EoB Friday (Sept. 23).
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>
>> 
>>
> 
> 
> 
>