[ogsa-wg] OGSA WSRF BP 1.0 Editor submission final call

[Andreas Savva]

I disagree. There are no firm decisions or plans so 'may' is more
appropriate at the moment.

Andreas

Djaoui, A (Abdeslem) wrote:

>Hi 
>
>Following from previous email... I see I am too late and a decision has
>already been made. So I suggest modifying the sentence
>"There may be
>additional profiles in the future that will include discovery functions"
>
>to:
>
>"Discovery will be covered by future specifications and profiles."
>
>Abdeslem
>//////////////
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-ogsa-wg at ggf.org [mailto:owner-ogsa-wg at ggf.org] On Behalf Of
>Hiro Kishimoto
>Sent: 22 September 2005 09:26
>To: ogsa-wg at ggf.org
>Subject: [ogsa-wg] OGSA WSRF BP 1.0 Editor submission final call
>
>Hi all,
>
>At the today's OGSA-WG call, we discussed BP 1.0 once more and agreed
>the following two;
>
>(1) Exclude UDDI section of WS-I BP 1.1 from OGSA WSRF BP
>Now, section 1.2 (page 4 line 114-116) says;
>
> > This Profile extends the WS-I Basic Profile 1.1 [WS-I BP 1.1]. All
>requirements except for section 5 "Service Publication and Discovery"
>specified in WS-I BP 1.1 pertain to this Profile. There may be
>additional profiles in the future that will include discovery functions.
>
>Revised really final draft (v043) is on the GridForge.
>https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-wg/document/draft-ggf-ogsa-wsr
>f-basic-profile/en/39
>
>(2) Submit OGSA WSRF BP 1.0 (v043) to GGF Editor this Friday
>Given that OGSA Basic Security Profiles need more time to complete
>(maybe after GGF15), we agreed to submit OGSA WSRF BP 1.0 alone to GGF
>Editor this Friday. If you have any farther comments on this draft,
>please let us know before EoB Friday (Sept. 23).
>
>Thanks,
>  
>