[ogsa-wg] Re: [ogsa-bes-wg] Abstract names in BES

[Christopher Smith]

For a mapping of BES to LSF, I would put something like a job id in the
abstract name, so that it could be used outside the web services world (say
with a CLI). Sure, it could be put in the payload of messages, or retrieved
via some explicit call, but it seems reasonable to use the abstract name for
this. 

-- Chris



On 9/11/05 17:28, "Ian Foster" <foster at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

> I found the call today very helpful.
> 
> One thing that I wanted to get clarification on is the requirement that
> motivates a desire for "abstract names" in BES.
> 
> I've heard one, which is that some entity may be handed two or more references
> (EPRs) to jobs, and want to know which of these are (not) unique.
> 
> Are there others?
> 
> Regards -- Ian.
> 
> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/ogsa-wg/attachments/20051109/eb8d3692/attachment.html