[ogsa-naming-wg] RNS 1.1 spec submitted

Osamu Tatebe tatebe at cs.tsukuba.ac.jp
Wed Dec 30 06:54:05 CST 2009 

Hi all,

Attached please find two documents I just submitted
to the editor.

Thanks a lot!
Osamu

On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 02:22:27 +0900
Osamu Tatebe <tatebe at cs.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Attached are modified documents of RNS spec 1.1 and OGSA
> rendering document.  I double checked the inconsistency
> between two documents.  I hope there is no major error
> in these documents.
> 
> I will submit them to the editor tomorrow.  If you find
> any typo or even small errors, please let us know now or
> during the public comment period.
> 
> Mark, would you submit ws-iterator document to the editor?
> 
> Thanks,
> Osamu
> 
> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 02:50:41 +0900
> Osamu Tatebe <tatebe at cs.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Thanks for pointing out the inconsistency.  I fixed about
> > response messages in RNS 1.1.  Lookup operation now returns
> > a list of response-entries not a list of entries.  Mark,
> > would you check this?
> > 
> > Also, I updated Faults and Failures section and fixed several
> > typos (not included in change history, sorry).  I hope these
> > include all required modifications we discuss recently.
> > 
> > Regarding the inconsistency between the spec and the rendering
> > document, I will check later.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Osamu
> > 
> > On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 14:05:15 +0900
> > Hideo Matsuda <matsuda at ist.osaka-u.ac.jp> wrote:
> > 
> > > Dear Tatebe-san and Mark,
> > > 
> > > Thank you very much for your editing the final version of
> > > RNS 1.1 document.
> > > 
> > > I would appreciate it if you could check the consistency
> > > between RNS 1.1 spec and rendering documents.
> > > 
> > > For example, RNS 1.1 spec has "response-entry" element
> > > in the addResponse message in p.8. But RNS 1.1 rendering
> > > seems not to have "response-entry" element.
> > > 
> > > Another minor comment is that add message has "rns:entryNameType"
> > > in p.7 in RNS 1.1 spec. But it seems to be "rns:EntryNameType".
> > > 
> > > Best regards,
> > > 
> > > Hideo Matsuda
> > > 
> > > > Hi all,
> > > > 
> > > > Attached is a final version of RNS 1.1 document I will submit to
> > > > the editor on 30 December, 2009.  If there is still something to
> > > > edit, please let me know.
> > > > 
> > > > Also, this RNS 1.1 spec depends on WS-Iterator specs.  Mark,
> > > > would you submit them to the editor?
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Osamu
> > > > 
> > > > On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 08:40:21 -0500
> > > > Mark Morgan <mmm2a at virginia.edu> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > >> Please find attached the revised versions of the documents as  
> > > >> discussed on the telecon last week.  I fixed the errors that Hideo  
> > > >> pointed out and fixed a couple of typos that came up while trying to  
> > > >> run the xsd and wsdl through out tooling.
> > > >>
> > > >> Osamu, you never sent me the list of authors/acknowledgements to add  
> > > >> so I'll leave it to you to add those to the document.
> > > >>
> > > >> -Mark
> > > >>
> > > >> On Nov 8, 2009, at 1:51 AM, Osamu Tatebe wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Thanks for pointing out errors.  We have a teleconference
> > > >>> as scheduled, and discussed about the document.  After some
> > > >>> errors in text and in schema are corrected, Mark will post
> > > >>> it to the ML soon.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks,
> > > >>> Osamu
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:24:56 +0900
> > > >>> Hideo Matsuda <matsuda at ist.osaka-u.ac.jp> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> I am very sorry for my late response.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> The spec is almost very fine for me.
> > > >>>> But a minor comment is that it is not appropriate that
> > > >>>> in page 17 in "RNS-rendering-v4.doc", the element has
> > > >>>> the name "xxxx Type" such as
> > > >>>> 	<wsdl:message name="AddRequest">
> > > >>>> 		<wsdl:part name="AddRequest"
> > > >>>> 			element="rns:AddRequestType"/>
> > > >>>> 	</wsdl:message>
> > > >>>> because add request message could be sent as "AddRequestType"
> > > >>>> (not "AddRequest"). If you want to replace it with "AddRequest",
> > > >>>> please remove "Type" from "element=" in page 17.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> And also change the definition of the complex port type in page 12:
> > > >>>> 	<!-- Messages -->
> > > >>>> 	<xsd:complexType name=”AddRequestType”>
> > > >>>> 		<xsd:sequence>
> > > >>>> 			<xsd:element name=”entry” type=”rns:RNSEntryType”
> > > >>>> 				minOccurs=”1” maxOccurs=”unbounded” nillable=”false”/>
> > > >>>> 		</xsd:sequence>
> > > >>>> 	</xsd:complexType>
> > > >>>> 	<xsd:element name=”AddRequestType” type=”rns:AddRequestType”/>
> > > >>>>                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > >>>> in which 'element name="AddRequestType"' is to be replaced with
> > > >>>> 'element name="AddRequest"' so that the message does not include  
> > > >>>> "xxx Type"
> > > >>>> in its element. Again, it is only a minor comment. The document  
> > > >>>> itself
> > > >>>> is very fine.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Best regards,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Hideo Matsuda
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> I appreciate your effort to write it up.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> As discussed in the WG session during the OGF27, we would
> > > >>>>> like to have a conference call in the first week of November
> > > >>>>> to discuss and finalize the RNS document for submission to
> > > >>>>> the editor.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> I suggest to have a Skype conference call at 10pm in JST
> > > >>>>> (8am in EST, I suppose the daylight saving time ends) on
> > > >>>>> Wednesday, November 4.  Everyone who is interested fine?  If
> > > >>>>> not, please let us know the convenient time slot.  (please
> > > >>>>> consider the Japan timezone JST+0900).
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> I will invite everyone who is interested in the discussion.
> > > >>>>> Let me know your Skype ID.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>>> Osamu
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> From: Mark Morgan <mmm2a at virginia.edu>
> > > >>>>> Subject: [GFS-WG] RNS 1.1 v4
> > > >>>>> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:27:56 -0400
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> As agreed last week, please find attached the updated RNS 1.1
> > > >>>>>> specification document and the RNS 1.1 OGSA WSRF BP Rendering
> > > >>>>>> document.  Hopefully this adequately represents the changes that we
> > > >>>>>> discussed.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> -Mark
> > > >>>>> --
> > > >>>>>  gfs-wg mailing list
> > > >>>>>  gfs-wg at ogf.org
> > > >>>>>  http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/gfs-wg
--
  gfs-wg mailing list
  gfs-wg at ogf.org
  http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/gfs-wg

More information about the ogsa-naming-wg mailing list