[ogsa-naming-wg] RNS 1.1 spec

[Hideo Matsuda]

Dear Tatebe-san and Mark,

Thank you very much for your editing the final version of
RNS 1.1 document.

I would appreciate it if you could check the consistency
between RNS 1.1 spec and rendering documents.

For example, RNS 1.1 spec has "response-entry" element
in the addResponse message in p.8. But RNS 1.1 rendering
seems not to have "response-entry" element.

Another minor comment is that add message has "rns:entryNameType"
in p.7 in RNS 1.1 spec. But it seems to be "rns:EntryNameType".

Best regards,

Hideo Matsuda

> Hi all,
> 
> Attached is a final version of RNS 1.1 document I will submit to
> the editor on 30 December, 2009.  If there is still something to
> edit, please let me know.
> 
> Also, this RNS 1.1 spec depends on WS-Iterator specs.  Mark,
> would you submit them to the editor?
> 
> Thanks,
> Osamu
> 
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 08:40:21 -0500
> Mark Morgan <mmm2a at virginia.edu> wrote:
> 
>> Please find attached the revised versions of the documents as  
>> discussed on the telecon last week.  I fixed the errors that Hideo  
>> pointed out and fixed a couple of typos that came up while trying to  
>> run the xsd and wsdl through out tooling.
>>
>> Osamu, you never sent me the list of authors/acknowledgements to add  
>> so I'll leave it to you to add those to the document.
>>
>> -Mark
>>
>> On Nov 8, 2009, at 1:51 AM, Osamu Tatebe wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for pointing out errors.  We have a teleconference
>>> as scheduled, and discussed about the document.  After some
>>> errors in text and in schema are corrected, Mark will post
>>> it to the ML soon.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Osamu
>>>
>>> On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:24:56 +0900
>>> Hideo Matsuda <matsuda at ist.osaka-u.ac.jp> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am very sorry for my late response.
>>>>
>>>> The spec is almost very fine for me.
>>>> But a minor comment is that it is not appropriate that
>>>> in page 17 in "RNS-rendering-v4.doc", the element has
>>>> the name "xxxx Type" such as
>>>> 	<wsdl:message name="AddRequest">
>>>> 		<wsdl:part name="AddRequest"
>>>> 			element="rns:AddRequestType"/>
>>>> 	</wsdl:message>
>>>> because add request message could be sent as "AddRequestType"
>>>> (not "AddRequest"). If you want to replace it with "AddRequest",
>>>> please remove "Type" from "element=" in page 17.
>>>>
>>>> And also change the definition of the complex port type in page 12:
>>>> 	<!-- Messages -->
>>>> 	<xsd:complexType name=”AddRequestType”>
>>>> 		<xsd:sequence>
>>>> 			<xsd:element name=”entry” type=”rns:RNSEntryType”
>>>> 				minOccurs=”1” maxOccurs=”unbounded” nillable=”false”/>
>>>> 		</xsd:sequence>
>>>> 	</xsd:complexType>
>>>> 	<xsd:element name=”AddRequestType” type=”rns:AddRequestType”/>
>>>>                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>> in which 'element name="AddRequestType"' is to be replaced with
>>>> 'element name="AddRequest"' so that the message does not include  
>>>> "xxx Type"
>>>> in its element. Again, it is only a minor comment. The document  
>>>> itself
>>>> is very fine.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Hideo Matsuda
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I appreciate your effort to write it up.
>>>>>
>>>>> As discussed in the WG session during the OGF27, we would
>>>>> like to have a conference call in the first week of November
>>>>> to discuss and finalize the RNS document for submission to
>>>>> the editor.
>>>>>
>>>>> I suggest to have a Skype conference call at 10pm in JST
>>>>> (8am in EST, I suppose the daylight saving time ends) on
>>>>> Wednesday, November 4.  Everyone who is interested fine?  If
>>>>> not, please let us know the convenient time slot.  (please
>>>>> consider the Japan timezone JST+0900).
>>>>>
>>>>> I will invite everyone who is interested in the discussion.
>>>>> Let me know your Skype ID.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Osamu
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Mark Morgan <mmm2a at virginia.edu>
>>>>> Subject: [GFS-WG] RNS 1.1 v4
>>>>> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:27:56 -0400
>>>>>
>>>>>> As agreed last week, please find attached the updated RNS 1.1
>>>>>> specification document and the RNS 1.1 OGSA WSRF BP Rendering
>>>>>> document.  Hopefully this adequately represents the changes that we
>>>>>> discussed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Mark
>>>>> --
>>>>>  gfs-wg mailing list
>>>>>  gfs-wg at ogf.org
>>>>>  http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/gfs-wg