[ogsa-naming-wg] New Version of OGSA Naming - more nitnoids

[Stephen Davey]

Just spotted a couple more tiny nitnoids in the Naming document. 

 

In section 4 the example EPR includes:

 

<wsa:Metadata>

<naming:EndpointIdentifier>

urn:guid:B94C4186-0923-4dbb-AD9C-39DFB8B54388

</name:EndpointIdentifier>

</wsa:Metadata>

 

The 4th line should be "naming" not "name", i.e.

 

</naming:EndpointIdentifier>

 

 

In section 5.2, the section title says "Including Resolver EPRs in
Application ERPs". I assume this should say 'Application EPRs' ?  Plus
line 4 of this section mentions an 'Appliocation EPR'.  

 

 

Cheers, Stephen.

 

--------------------------

Stephen Davey, 

National e-Science Centre,

Edinburgh, UK.

  _____  

From: owner-ogsa-naming-wg at ggf.org [mailto:owner-ogsa-naming-wg at ggf.org]
On Behalf Of Michael Behrens
Sent: 12 August 2006 19:18
Cc: ogsa-naming-wg at ggf.org
Subject: Re: [ogsa-naming-wg] New Version of OGSA Naming

 

Looks good!
One nitnoid for who ever has the pen:  I believe IRI be stated instead
of URI in the item below: 

*	MUST conform to URI syntax [RFC 3987]



David Snelling wrote: 

Folks, 

Sorry for the large posting. The OGSA-Naming site is not allowing me  to
post - maybe I just need to sign up as a GF member. 

Joel, Can you post both these documents in "Documents > Root Folder >
Current Drafts"? 

What I have done: 

1) Accepted all previous changes. 

2) Rewrote major sections (lots of out of date stuff about WS-
Addressing being pre standard etc.) 

3) Reorganized the sections around the 4 specs outlined in the use
cases document, 

4) Added the missing sections that were my action items. 

5) Separated normative and non-normative parts of each section, see
subsections "Non Normative Discussion". These sections could probably
be extended. 

6) I removed the SOAP message examples. These could go back in an
appendix, but they would be non normative (I don't like having too  much
of this is a spec) and I wanted to get this out sooner. 

7) Asked Michel Drescher to do a new set of schema and WSDL. 

There are two documents attached: 

1) draft-ws-naming-August-2006-1-ct.doc: This has all my changes
tracked. This is provided for process reasons. I really expect folks
top start with the clean copy. 

2) draft-ws-naming-August-2006-1.doc: I have accepted all my own
changes, since it is virtually a new document. People should start  with
this, and use the above to identify things they thought were  there and
went away. 

Enjoy! 










-- 
Michael Behrens
R2AD, LLC
(571) 594-3008 (cell)
(703) 714-0442 (land)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/ogsa-naming-wg/attachments/20060816/21142790/attachment.html