[ogsa-hpcp-wg] [Fwd: FIle Staging Extensions Comment]

Marty Humphrey humphrey at cs.virginia.edu
Thu Jul 3 08:24:23 CDT 2008


I agree with this -- again, we didn't want the compliant implementation to
need to support TWO options here, and in addition be faced with the
confusion regarding a message that contains BOTH. So we think restricting
the URI is a good thing.

-----Original Message-----
From: ogsa-hpcp-wg-bounces at ogf.org [mailto:ogsa-hpcp-wg-bounces at ogf.org] On
Behalf Of Christopher Smith
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 11:08 AM
To: Mark Morgan; Steven Newhouse
Cc: ogsa-hpcp-wg at ogf.org
Subject: Re: [ogsa-hpcp-wg] [Fwd: FIle Staging Extensions Comment]

I believe one of the motivating factors for leaving it out was to deal with
the ambiguity of having embedded username/password in potential conflict
with the "Credential" element. We decided to say that if you want to pass
username and password, do it in the Credential element. Otherwise you get in
a situation where the implementation doesn't know which username/password to
use.

Simplify in order to aid interoperability was the guiding principal. I, for
one, stick with the original reasoning and think restricting the URI is a
good idea.

-- Chris


On 30/6/08 06:20, "Mark Morgan" <mmm2a at virginia.edu> wrote:

> Well, just to be clear on my purpose in mailing the group, it wasn't  to
> ask the group to put username/password into the URI or to specify a
> format for putting it into the URI.  My concern was that the HPCP
> specification explicitly prohibits an HPCP File Extension compliant
> endpoint from accepting the username/password in the URI.  While I agree
> in principle that username/password in the URI is unsafe, I don't think
> that the HPCP Profile should restrict or limit another valid
> implementation from using it that way.  Can't the HPCP simply specify
> what the File Extensions add as specification and remain silent on other
> ways of doing it?
> 
> -Mark
> 
> On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 22:53 -0700, Steven Newhouse wrote:
>> Which is why we decided not to support the credential embedded in the URI
and
>> to put in an extensible Credential element placed in the JSDL document
for
>> each stage in/out element.
>> 
>> Steven
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Donal K. Fellows [mailto:donal.k.fellows at manchester.ac.uk]
>>> Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 4:38 PM
>>> To: Steven Newhouse
>>> Cc: ogsa-hpcp-wg at ogf.org
>>> Subject: Re: [ogsa-hpcp-wg] [Fwd: FIle Staging Extensions Comment]
>>> 
>>> Steven Newhouse wrote:
>>>> It was discussed in the working group. My recollection was that there
>>>> was no defined 'standard' mechanism for embedding a username and
>>>> password into an scp uri. Therefore we did not feel happy specifying
>>>> one.
>>> 
>>> I'd have thought in that case that going with the "generic URI" format
>>> for usernames and passwords would be the right thing then, leading to:
>>> 
>>>    scp://user:pass@host.com/path/to/file
>>> 
>>> This will be pretty easy to implement (stripping the password out and
>>> passing it to the copier correctly won't be a big challenge). However,
>>> reading http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986 (the current definition of
>>> the generic URI format) leads to a problem with this, in that the
>>> embedding of passwords here is massively unsafe and leads to a range of
>>> troubles (including, but not limited to, making the document highly
>>> security-sensitive). I think we already knew that! (On the plus side, I
>>> don't think we need to worry so much about the issues documented in
>>> section 7.6 of that RFC for now; JSDL isn't a user-focussed format...)
>>> 
>>> What we really need here is proper security delegation. That's the only
>>> solution which is actually of any real long-term good. This is just a
>>> (necessary) band-aid.
>>> 
>>> Donal.
>> 
>> --
>>   ogsa-hpcp-wg mailing list
>>   ogsa-hpcp-wg at ogf.org
>>   http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogsa-hpcp-wg
> 
> --
>   ogsa-hpcp-wg mailing list
>   ogsa-hpcp-wg at ogf.org
>   http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogsa-hpcp-wg

--
  ogsa-hpcp-wg mailing list
  ogsa-hpcp-wg at ogf.org
  http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogsa-hpcp-wg



More information about the ogsa-hpcp-wg mailing list