[ogsa-hpcp-wg] Reminder: HPC Profile conf call Wed Nov 29 8am Pacific time: post-SC2006 discussion

[Marty Humphrey]

Folks,

A reminder: we'll have a call tomorrow at 8am Pacific to discuss what  
we learned from the implementations of the HPC Profile for SC2006.

We'll shortly send out telephone call info...

-- Marty



Quoting Marty Humphrey <humphrey at cs.virginia.edu>:

> Folks,
>
> First, I want to THANK EVERYBODY for their hard work leading up to and
> including the SC2006 interop demofest! I think we made tremendous progress
> and I want to continue the momentum inside the BES, JSDL, and HPC Profile
> working groups!!!!
>
> I propose that we have a conference call on Wed Nov 29 at 8am US Pacific
> time to discuss what we each learned while we implemented the HPC Profile,
> and where we as a group go from here. Please let me know if you can make
> this call (a few people said that Fridays were not good, so we're trying a
> different day -- but note: this is not necessarily proposed as a weekly
> call, this is just a "special" call to discuss things while SC is still in
> our minds).
>
> Rich Ciapala, Chris Smith and I tried to identify the unresolved issues that
> we either directly encountered or someone raised on the mailing list. We
> have certainly tried to capture everything but we probably missed a few
> things.
>
>
> Audience
>
> Topic
>
>
> HPCP WG
>
> Finalize security additions to profile
>
>
> BES WG
>
> Finalize faults for all operations
>
>
> BES WG
>
> Limit amount of data that can be returned from GetAttributesDocument
>
>
> HPCP WG
>
> Tools for which the schemas should work cleanly with
>
>
> JSDL WG
>
> RangeValue_Type element clarifications
>
> *         If a single min value and a single max value are to be specified,
> should it be done with Boundary_Type's or a single Range_Type?
>
> *         I assume Exact takes precedence over any specified Boundary_Type
> or Range_Type's since Exact is a MUST and the others are optional.
>
>
> BES WG
>
> Finalize Fault element's type for multiple response operations. We changed
> this from soap:Fault to xsd:anyType for the demo.
>
>
> HPCP WG
>
> Finalize list of dependent WS-I specs
>
>
> BES WG
>
> Use of QNAMEs in GetAttributesDocument response
>
>
> HPCP WG
>
> Data staging support
>
>
> BES WG
>
> Clarify operations semantics (i.e. TerminateActivity)
>
>  So, please let me know if you can make this call on Wed Nov 29. Also, let's
> start email discussions on the appropriate mailing lists to attempt to
> resolve some of these (or at least prioritize these and identify new ones)
> before the call next Wednesday.
>
> Thanks again -- I think everything's coming together really well!!!
>
> -- Marty
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.