[ogsa-dmi-wg] Aggregation Proposal

[Michel Drescher]

Hi all,

I think the text is okay. I would like it to stress out a bit further  
that
a) it's the DEPR minter's responsibility to model the transfer  
protocol dependent URLs accordingly, and
b) that the abstract DEPR modelling of composite/aggregated data  
transfers finds its realisation in the concrete data transfer URL to  
be used for moving the data.

Cheers,
Michel

On 18 Dec 2007, at 19:14, Steven Newhouse wrote:

> Text looks fine. Any thoughts as to which section of the  
> specification you would put it?
>
>
>
> Steven
>
>
>
> From: ogsa-dmi-wg-bounces at ogf.org [mailto:ogsa-dmi-wg- 
> bounces at ogf.org] On Behalf Of Ravi Madduri
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 12:11 PM
> To: ogsa-dmi-wg at ogf.org
> Subject: [ogsa-dmi-wg] Aggregation Proposal
>
>
>
> All:
>
> Please find attached my aggregation proposal
>
>
>
> Please comment
>
> --
>   ogsa-dmi-wg mailing list
>   ogsa-dmi-wg at ogf.org
>   http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogsa-dmi-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/ogsa-dmi-wg/attachments/20071219/f61a35c1/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/ogsa-dmi-wg/attachments/20071219/f61a35c1/attachment.bin