[ogsa-dmi-wg] Retries Proposal

[Michel Drescher]

The current proposal looks fine.

On the back-off time, I am inclined to make this an implementation  
detail, i.e. we may mention it in the text but otherwise do not  
standardise on it. People may consider passing it in as an extension,  
if we allow for that in the TrensferRequirements element.

Cheers,
Michel

On 18 Dec 2007, at 19:57, Ravi Madduri wrote:

> I am all for it.
> On Dec 18, 2007, at 1:16 PM, Steven Newhouse wrote:
>
>> Only one thought on reading it… do we need a parameter to control  
>> a back-off time between retries? After a failure wait X seconds  
>> before retrying? Should the interval increase (i.e. double) with  
>> each attempt.
>>
>> Just a suggestion… otherwise it looks good.
>>
>> Steven
>>
>> From: ogsa-dmi-wg-bounces at ogf.org [mailto:ogsa-dmi-wg- 
>> bounces at ogf.org] On Behalf Of Ravi Madduri
>> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 10:48 AM
>> To: Ravi Madduri
>> Cc: ogsa-dmi-wg at ogf.org
>> Subject: Re: [ogsa-dmi-wg] Retries Proposal
>>
>> Hi
>> Please find attached my retries proposal with mario's comments and  
>> some corrections from my side ( in response to Mario's  
>> corrections ). Please comment
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>
> --
> Ravi K Madduri
> The Globus Alliance | Argonne National Laboratory | University of  
> Chicago
> http://www-unix.mcs.anl.gov/~madduri
>
> --
>   ogsa-dmi-wg mailing list
>   ogsa-dmi-wg at ogf.org
>   http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogsa-dmi-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/ogsa-dmi-wg/attachments/20071219/c648f940/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/ogsa-dmi-wg/attachments/20071219/c648f940/attachment-0001.bin