[OGSA-BES-WG] The up-to-date specification?

Piotr Domagalski szalik at szalik.net
Wed Feb 20 16:08:43 CST 2008


On Feb 20, 2008 9:05 PM, Steven Newhouse <Steven.Newhouse at microsoft.com> wrote:

> If you fail authorization under the container's rule it is the container that sends the fault

And that is what I've been asking for - what the fault should look
like. I have my own container (which does authentication and
authorization) so I must choose the most suitable fault to return.

> > - I use whatever fault I like but decrease the interoperability
> > (still, WSDL modification needed)
>
> There's nothing stopping you doing this apart from interoperability!

That's what I surely don't want to do.

Summing up, the only solution I can see now is to return standard SOAP
fault with added human readable description saying that this general
fault was thrown because of an authorization failure so that the
client at the other side knows the reason her call was rejected.

-- 
Piotr Domagalski


More information about the ogsa-bes-wg mailing list