[OGSA-BES-WG] BES schema/wsdl

[Peter G. Lane]

I argued against this, actually, because the types that are in the WSDL don't have any applicability 
outside of the WSDL. That said, if the rest of the group thinks that convention is enough to 
overlook that, I'm not going to complain. We're trying to avoid large changes like this so we can 
release the spec for public review, so my vote would still be to leave it alone regardless.

Peter

Vivian Li wrote:
> Another suggestion while browsing the BES schema/wsdl, it might be
> easier to maintain if the data types in the schema and the wsdl are
> separated completely, e.g. move the "Message Types" in the schema
> section from the wsdl to the schema file, it has been kind of convention
> in all the other WGs.
> 
> Vivian
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3804 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/ogsa-bes-wg/attachments/20061024/16ad068c/attachment.bin