[ogsa-bes-wg] Questions and potential changes to BES, as seen from HPC Profile point-of-view

[Marvin Theimer]

Hi;

I will look into the question of what sorts of Windows-specific things
might be appropriate for a WindowsApplicationType.  I suspect that if we
have a common ApplicationType that includes the things we've talked
about then the WindowsApplicationType may be fairly small -- at least
that's what I'm hoping for. :-)

Marvin.

-----Original Message-----
From: Donal K. Fellows [mailto:donal.k.fellows at manchester.ac.uk] 
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 5:49 AM
To: Marvin Theimer
Cc: A S McGough; ogsa-bes-wg at ggf.org; Ed Lassettre; JSDL Working Group
Subject: Re: [ogsa-bes-wg] Questions and potential changes to BES, as
seen from HPC Profile point-of-view

Marvin Theimer wrote:
> Currently the posix extension to jsdl includes various things that I 
> would argue are more generic than posix.  I think it would be 
> interesting to define a common subset (that includes things execution 
> pathname, command-line args, and working directory) as well as
defining 
> a WindowsApplicationType that describes those things that are 
> Windows-specific.

I believe[*] it is possible to define a new element type that describes
an abstract ExecutableApplication element with these generic bits in and
which is grandfathered into being a supertype of the POSIXApplication
element (as well as being the parent of the WindowsApplication you're
positing). This would require a small change to the existing schema,
though we'd want to make sure that the documents accepted by the schema
remained the same, and would enable this suggestion (which I approve of,
by the way) to be slotted into the larger scheme of things without fuss.

By the way, what would these extra Windows-specific bits be? I can
imagine a number of the POSIX things being dropped (e.g. the limits) but
I'm not nearly well-versed enough on Win (despite using it a lot) to be
able to think what these extra additions might be. Just out of
curiosity! :-)

Donal.
[* This is believe as in "I've done this sort of thing in other schemas"
so I know that XML Schema can support it. ]