[ogsa-bes-wg] Questions and potential changes to BES, as seen from HPC Profile point-of-view

Donal K. Fellows donal.k.fellows at manchester.ac.uk
Tue Jun 6 04:06:30 CDT 2006


Peter Lane wrote:
> Marvin Theimer wrote:
>> ·        JSDL seems to inherently be focused on describing a single 
>> job or a single computational resource.  For example, it has no notion 
>> of describing all the differing compute nodes of a (heterogeneous) 
>> compute cluster.  By incorporating JSDL elements into the BES 
>> information model it seems that BES is foreclosing the ability to 
>> describe things like compute clusters.  This issue also effects what 
>> can get returned from GetActivityJSDLDocuments.  If I’m wrong about 
>> this, then it seems like it would be worth having an explicit 
>> explanation about how to achieve this functionality somewhere in the 
>> specification.
>>
> I think I complained about this here as well. Certainly I've complained 
> to the JSDL people and the ESI people about this. The JDSL people 
> answered something about keeping it simple for now. My guess is that 
> people see it for the daunting task it is an prefer not to address it. 
> I'm not criticizing anyone for this. It's just my take on the problem.

JSDL describes the resources that are to be allocated to the job (err,
activity) and it is not designed to handle the description of the
resources allocated to the container. This matters for a whole bunch of
reasons (some unrelated to this discussion) but what is crucial here is
that the case you're describing only matters if you're constructing an
atomic activity that is itself inherently heterogenous. Do users do
that? Or are they happier with describing their task as a set of
coordinated (and presumably isochronous) activities with a different
JSDL-style resource requirement for each? If, as I believe, they really
want the latter, we can punt the majority of the heterogenous resource
mess and focus on easier things.

On the other hand, there is still a need to describe heterogenous
clusters; they're not going away soon. The easiest way is probably to
allow the BES to publish something like multiple JSDL Resources
elements, one for each kind of node in the cluster, and for the
composition rule for these separate elements to be "I have *all* of
these". The only complication with that approach is that it doesn't
easily support the case where you want to just use resources at the
lowest common denominator level, making resource matching more complex.
Oh well.

Donal.





More information about the ogsa-bes-wg mailing list