[ogf20pc] OGF20 community submissions for ranking

[Stephen M Pickles]

Dave,

Is there a definitive list of criteria against which
these proposals should be ranked?

Stephen


________________________________

	From: ogf20pc-bounces at ogf.org [mailto:ogf20pc-bounces at ogf.org] On Behalf Of Dave Berry
	Sent: 15 February 2007 12:41
	To: ogf20pc at ogf.org
	Subject: [ogf20pc] OGF20 community submissions for ranking
	
	
	Dear PC,
	 
	Please find attached a spreadsheet that summarises the proposals received via the CFP.  Our immediate task is to rank the submissions on the first sheet, which lists the workshop proposals.  As discussed, please use the following ranking:
	 
	1 - Not suitable for OGF.
	2 - A session that fails some of the criteria and should only be included if we need to fill slots.
	3 - A good session that fits all or most of the criteria; to be included if slots is available.
	4 - A good session that fits all the criteria; to be included if possible.
	5 - An excellent session that should be included no matter what
		 
	Do add comments where appropriate, e.g. if you wish to recommend merging with another session, or accepting with fewer sessions.
	 
	Please mail your rankings to me and I will summarise.  We will discuss the results on next Tuesday's call.
	 
	Note: non-workshop proposals have been moved to the other sheets - Enterprise sessions, Grid Means Business, and Other.  Please note that these sheets do not show the complete line-up for these tracks; only those submitted via the CFP.
	 
	Best wishes,
	 
	Dave Berry
	Deputy Director, Research & E-infrastructure Development
	National e-Science Centre, 15 South College Street
	Edinburgh, EH8 9AA                  +44 131 651 4039