[ogf20pc] Draft outline for industry track

Tue Nov 14 11:47:40 CST 2006

Ok, that is helpful. Also helpful to hear from John Brooke that there is a
good concentration of pharma startups in the Manchester area that should be
easy to attract to the show. Thanks all, ~Brooklin

From: Robert Cohen <bcohen at bway.net>
Reply-To: <bcohen at bway.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:33:47 -0500
To: Brooklin Gore <bgore at micron.com>
Cc: Dave Berry <daveb at nesc.ac.uk>, <ogf20pc at ogf.org>
Subject: Re: [ogf20pc] Draft outline for industry track

Hi Brooklin,

I am not sure that you are aware of what the Industry Group was trying to do
in Washington at GGF18, but we had two sessions with industry people with
extensive experience using Grids. The idea is to get industry oriented users
to pinpoint issues they face in using Grids (issues that will probably prove
to be similar to what other firms in that industry will face). These issues
are to feed into an exercise that is part of promoting greater collaboration
between the standards side of OGF and the Enterprise/Science side. Issues
from the user side can identify areas where advances in standards would be
most helpful to users in industry and science. In the Washington sessions,
there was certainly evidence from users that Grids were adding value and
could be used at a wide range of firms in the sectors that were part of the
discussion. There were also a number of attendees that were relatively new
users of Grids.

In previous discussions of the OGF20PC, there was no attempt to have the
industry sessions be the only sessions available for users to attend. But
the idea was to continue the process that was begun in Washington. If many
people feel that is not a productive way to move ahead, the entire process
should be canned.

Bob Cohen

Brooklin Gore wrote:
>  Re: [ogf20pc] Draft outline for industry track I¹m still a little confused
> with the concept on industry tracks like auto and pharma, etc. I wonder how
> many businesses Œnew¹ to the grid would be attracted by these sessions.
> Certainly one or two companies from this segment doing a case study on why the
> grid is good for their business (with elements that could be applied to other
> companies not yet doing grid) would be great, I just don¹t understand the
> value of branding along an industry segment.
>  
> I think every presentation should make attendees not using grid yet 1) want to
> come and 2) walk away beleiving 1) this stuff is really adding business value
> 2) we can use this stuff.
>  
> ~Brooklin
>  
>  
> 
> From: Robert Cohen <bcohen at bway.net> <mailto:bcohen at bway.net>
>  Reply-To: <bcohen at bway.net> <mailto:bcohen at bway.net>
>  Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:08:00 -0500
>  To: Dave Berry <daveb at nesc.ac.uk> <mailto:daveb at nesc.ac.uk> ,
> <ogf20pc at ogf.org> <mailto:ogf20pc at ogf.org>
>  Subject: Re: [ogf20pc] Draft outline for industry track
>  
> Dave,
>  
> This looks ok, but it does leave out the main sessions for the industry track
> that we had discussed that would be parallel sessions on Tuesday. These would
> include the sessions from the draft "Straw man OGF20 industry":
>  
>   
>> 
>> Also on Tuesday: Enterprise Requirements workshops
>> These are scheduled to run at the same time as the ³Issues in Grids²
>> sessions.  We can take advantage of the people attending these workshops to
>> give presentations in other sessions, e.g. in the Collaborative Grids
>> session.
>> 11:00-12:30:    Auto & Aerospace industry requirements
>> 16:00-17:30:    Pharma industry requirements
>> 18:00-19:30     Requirements roll-up meeting
>>  
>>  
>>  
>  It would be useful to have the Collaboration Grids session after the Auto and
> Aerospace industry requirements meeting so that people from the requirements
> session could present there.
>  
> Bob Cohen
>  
>  
> Dave Berry wrote:
>   
>>    
>>  Dear PC,
>>   
>>  
>>  
>>  At the last meeting of industry sub-committee I took a task to prepare an
>> outline of the industry track, as we understand it so far, that people could
>> give to potential participants.  I have now done this and attach the result.
>>   
>>  
>>  
>>  Best wishes,
>>   
>>  
>>  
>>  Dave Berry
>>   
>>  Deputy Director, Research & E-infrastructure Development
>>   
>>  National e-Science Centre, 15 South College Street
>>   
>>  Edinburgh, EH8 9AA                  +44 131 651 4039
>>   
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> ogf20pc mailing list
>> ogf20pc at ogf.org
>>  http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf20pc
>>   
>>  
>  
>  
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ogf20pc mailing list
> ogf20pc at ogf.org
>  http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf20pc
>  

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/ogf20pc/attachments/20061114/749a19fc/attachment-0001.htm 